vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

The making of oncology: The tales of false carcinogenic worms

2017/03/31 by Kholhring Lalchhandama · 2 citations
Immunology and Microbiology · Medicine · #Parasites and Host Interactions #Opisthorchis viverrini #Helminths #Cancer #Pathology #Biology #Medicine #Zoology #Liver fluke #Internal medicine

paper · pdf · doi:10.33493/scivis.17.01.06

published in Science Vision 17(1), 33-52

openalex publication_date 2017/03/31 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21

Abstract

Cancer is a disease of antiquity. The Ancient Greeks were familiar with onkos (from which we have the term oncology)—tumour of all sorts. Hippocrates coined karkinos and karkinoma, our source of the words cancer and carcinoma. Of a plethora of carcinogens, parasitic worms (helminths) constitute a considerable health concern. Three trematodes, Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis viverrini, and Schistosoma haematobium are now officially classified carcinogens. But the discovery of helminths as cancer-causing agents took wrong turns and marks an inglorious chapter in the history of science. The carcinogenicity of worms, vindicating Rudolf Virchow’s reiztheorie (irritation theory) of cancer origin, was glorified in the scientific forefront by Johannes Fibiger in the 1910s. Discovery of a new nematode, which he proudly named Spiroptera carcinoma, and his subsequent demonstration that the parasite could induce stomach cancer in rats, earned Fibiger a retrospective Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1926, and a lasting fame. But not in an appealing way. His achievement did not withstand the test of time. S. carcinoma was annulled as an invalid taxon in zoology—supplanted by Gongylonema neoplasticum—and eventually was branded as a non-carcinogenic agent.

Citations

Cited by

Related