2017/04/12 by Kleanthes Κ. Grohmann, Elena Papadopoulou, Charalambos Themistocleous · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · Psychology · #Multilingual Education and Policy #Linguistic Variation and Morphology #Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies #Clitic #Linguistics #Diglossia #Modern Greek #Object (grammar) #Standard language #Psychology #History #Arabic #Philosophy
paper · pdf · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2017.00005
openalex publication_date 2017/04/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
This paper examines the development of object clitic placement by children acquiring Cypriot Greek. Greek-speaking Cyprus is sociolinguistically characterized by diglossia between two varieties of Greek, the local Cypriot Greek and the official Standard Modern Greek. Arguably as a result of this situation, clitics may be placed post- (enclisis) or preverbally (proclisis) in the same syntactic environment; while the former is a property of Cypriot Greek, the latter is typically considered an effect of the standard language. The following issues are investigated here: (a) how such bilectal speakers distinguish between the two Greek varieties with respect to clitic placement; (b) how the acquisition of clitics develops over time; (c) how, and which, sociolinguistic factors determine clitic placement; and (d) how schooling may affect clitic placement. To address (a)–(d), a sentence completion task was used to elicit clitic productions, administered to 431 children around Cyprus ranging from 2;8 to 8;11. The C5.0 machine-learning algorithm was employed to model the interaction of (socio-)linguistic factors on the development of clitic placement. The model shows that speakers acquire the relevant features very early, yet compartmentalization of form and function according to style emerges only as they engage in the larger speech community. In addition, the effects of sociolinguistic factors on clitic placement appear gradually.