2018/07/19 by Justin Begley · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #Historical and Literary Studies #Historical Influence and Diplomacy #Historical Art and Culture Studies #Latin Americans #Mythology #Reading (process) #History #Classics #Medieval Latin #Literature #Art #Law #Political science
paper · doi:10.1093/res/hgy069
openalex publication_date 2018/07/19 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
This article explores a hitherto unstudied copy of De vita […] Guilielmi ducis Novo-Castrensis (1668)—a Latin translation of The Life of William Cavendish (1667) by Margaret Cavendish (1623?–1673)—that Arthur Annesley (1614–1686), the First Earl of Anglesey, has heavily annotated. While Annesley owned the largest private library in seventeenth-century Britain, his copy of De vita is by far the most densely glossed of his identifiable books, with no fewer than sixty-one Latin and Greek annotations, not to mention numerous corrections and non-verbal markers. By studying Annesley’s careful treatment of De vita, this essay makes an intervention into the burgeoning fields of reading and library history along with neo-Latin studies. I propose that Annesley filled the margins of De vita with quotations from Latin poets, scholars, philosophers, and historians—rather than his personal views—in a bid to form a politically impartial outlook on the British Civil Wars that was attuned to broader historical or even mythological trends.