2008/05/12 by John Sharp, Rob Bowker, Jenny Byrne · 3 citations
Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function #Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences #Education Methods and Practices #Scholarship #Casual #Assertion #Promotion (chess) #Psychology #Sociology #Political science #Computer science #Law
paper · doi:10.1080/02671520701755416
openalex publication_date 2008/05/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Developments within education, psychology and the neurosciences have shed a great deal of light on how we learn while, at the same time, confirming for us all that learning is a profoundly complex process and far from understood. Against this background, and in this position article, we consider the recent rise in interest in the concept of learning styles as VAK (visual, auditory, kinaesthetic) in primary schools in England and Wales and begin to identify and interrogate some of the more unorthodox claims frequently used to legitimise and lend support to its validity. Through the casual acceptance and promotion of VAK, and its often wider association with the notions of accelerated and brain‐based learning, it is our assertion that the complexity of learning is becoming increasingly trivialised and scholarship at all levels within certain sectors of the education community compromised.