2017/02/28 by Giuliano Giacalone, Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler, Jean-Yves Ollitrault · 82 citations
Engineering · Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Algorithm #Environmental science #Flow (mathematics) #Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory #High-Energy Particle Collisions Research #Mathematics #Mechanics #Nuclear reactor physics and engineering #Physics #State (computer science) #Statistical physics #hep-ph #nucl-ex #nucl-th
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.054910
published in Physical Review C 95(5) (American Institute of Physics) · v1: 10 pages, 7 figures. v2: published version. Added predictions of rcBK model in Fig.2. Data tables available in ancillary files
openalex publication_date 2017/05/18 · arxiv created 2017/05/24 · arxiv updated 2017/05/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
Elliptic flow, v2, and triangular flow, v3, are to a good approximation linearly proportional to the corresponding spatial anisotropies of the initial density profile, \ensuremathε2 and \ensuremathε3. Using event-by-event hydrodynamic simulations, we point out when deviations from this linear scaling are to be expected. When these deviations are negligible, relative vn fluctuations are equal to relative \ensuremathεn fluctuations, and one can directly probe models of initial conditions using ratios of cumulants, for instance vn4/vn2. We argue that existing models of initial conditions tend to overestimate flow fluctuations in central Pb + Pb collisions, and to underestimate them in peripheral collisions. We make predictions for v36 in noncentral Pb + Pb collisions, and for v34 and v36 in high-multiplicity p+Pb collisions.