2011/04/01 by John Simister · 6 citations
Social Sciences · Psychology · Medicine · #Social and Economic Development in India #Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East #Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare #Disappointment #Rest (music) #Literacy #Literacy rate #Test (biology) #Social science #Development economics #Economic growth #Geography #Political science #Sociology #Psychology #Economics #Social psychology #Medicine #Biology
paper · doi:10.1177/097317411100600101
published in Journal of South Asian Development 6(1), 1-24 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2011/04/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/16
Kerala is often praised as being more developed, in some respects, than the rest of India: several development indicators, such as literacy rates and health, suggest that Kerala is much more successful than the rest of India. However, a growing minority of observers have expressed disappointment with Kerala. Some writers suggest Kerala is poorer than we might expect given its high literacy rate; other writers argue that women in Kerala are not as empowered as previous researchers implied. This article tests the hypothesis that successes which have been achieved by the ‘Kerala model’ are mainly a result of education. This ‘education hypothesis’ is contrasted with various other possible explanations of Kerala’s success, which suggest Kerala is unique in some way—for reason(s) which are disputed and which often seem impossible to test by scientific analysis. However, Kerala is not successful in every respect; this article examines some remaining problems in Kerala.