2008/01/01 by Cheston B. Cunha, Burke A. Cunha · 1 citation
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Arts and Humanities · Medicine · #Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research #Paleopathology and ancient diseases #Zoonotic diseases and public health #Plague (disease) #Variety (cybernetics) #History #Perspective (graphical) #Classics #Ancient history #Art #Computer science #Visual arts #Artificial intelligence
paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75855-6_1
openalex publication_date 2008/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
Due to the difficulty of obtaining tissue samples from victims of the ancient plagues, it is not always possible to utilise palaeomicrobiology techniques to determine the etiology of ancient infection. Therefore, it is often necessary to utilise other means to arrive at a likely diagnosis. The most helpful of these is the literary description of the disease. While this is often the best evidence available, working with such documents can prove difficult. Three great plagues of the ancient world, the Plague of Athens, the Antonine Plague, and the Justiniac Plague are described in either Latin or ancient Greek. The difficulties encountered when translating any ancient foreign language are compounded by the fact that so many words in these languages have a variety of meanings. This chapter reviews the three great plagues of antiquity from a clinical perspective.