2011/06/01 by Sari Braithwaite, Tom Gara, Jane Lydon · 2 citations
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #Australian Indigenous Culture and History #Australian History and Society #Museums and Cultural Heritage #Indigenous #Colonialism #Vision #Buckingham #Settlement (finance) #History #Power (physics) #Narrative #Empire #Counterpoint #Irish #Representation (politics) #Visual culture #British Empire #Sociology #Art history #Media studies #Law #Literature #Art #Politics #Anthropology #Archaeology #Political science #Philosophy
paper · doi:10.1080/14443058.2011.560576
openalex publication_date 2011/06/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
This paper explores the representation of Tenberry, a Ngaiwong man from Moorundie on the Murray River in South Australia, and his significant place in the colonial discourse of European settlement and race relations over the first decades of settlement. From around 1845, when he made his first public appearance in the engraved frontispiece to Edward John Eyre's journals of exploration, his image was circulated through explorer's narratives, pioneer reminiscences, evangelical propaganda, the developing colonial art scene, scientific collections, and popular press accounts. Producing and circulating stereotypes such as “King” Tenberry and his “manly” and “amiable” son Warrulan systematically defined Indigenous Australia for British colonists; with all the power, clarity and seeming truth of visual imagery, these allowed them to see Tenberry as guardian of tradition and the past, in counterpoint to visions of Warrulan's future, whose “capacity for improvement,” once removed from his people, gave settlers cause for hope. As these images travelled from Moorundie to the centres of Empire, they mapped a global visual economy that told the colonisers’ story of progress, displacing the Indigenous people in imagined but powerful ways.