1993/04/01 by Robert W. Park · 1 citation
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Social Sciences · Health Professions · Psychology · #Archaeology and ancient environmental studies #Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology #Indigenous Studies and Ecology #Artifact (error) #Context (archaeology) #Arctic #Archaeology #Radiocarbon dating #History #Ecological succession #The arctic #Face (sociological concept) #Head (geology) #Geography #Ethnology #Oceanography #Geology #Sociology #Paleontology #Ecology #Social science #Psychology
paper · doi:10.2307/281966
openalex publication_date 1993/04/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/03
Most Arctic archaeologists believe that the people of the Thule culture, who arrived in the eastern Arctic approximately 1,000 years ago, met people of the Dorset culture and acquired important knowledge from them while replacing them in this region. The most convincing indication for technology transfer comes from the Thule adoption of Dorset harpoon-head styles. However, a review of radiocarbon dates, artifact styles, and site data reveals no conclusive evidence for face-to-face contact between the people of these two cultures. Given evidence that the Thule actively salvaged harpoon heads and carvings from abandoned Dorset sites, I contend that salvage was the sole means of contact between these cultures and the means by which harpoon-head technology was transferred. This example points out the importance of salvage as a mode of culture contact and the weakness of studies that interpret changes in material culture solely in a culture-historical context.