2012/02/24 by Diana White, Joyce Fortune · 1 citation
Decision Sciences · Health Professions · Business, Management and Accounting · Engineering · #Construction Project Management and Performance #Occupational Health and Safety Research #Value Engineering and Management #Viewpoints #Originality #Project stakeholder #Newspaper #Project management #Set (abstract data type) #Systems thinking #Bridge (graph theory) #Borough #Project management triangle #Engineering management #Computer science #Process management #Project charter #Engineering #Business #Political science #Public administration #Systems engineering
paper · doi:10.1108/09699981211206124
openalex publication_date 2012/02/24 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/26
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to set out the results of a study of a major landmark construction project and to use systems thinking to shed light on the organisation, management and performance of the project. Design/methodology/approach The three main methods of gathering the data were a series of formal and informal interviews with representatives of Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council and their main project partner Harbour and General, regular visits to the main construction site and the secondary site where the bridge was pre‐fabricated and an extensive study of newspaper and magazine articles, Council minutes and memoranda and other relevant literature. The paper also employs a systems‐based approach whereby the project is represented as a system and compared with an ideal model of a system that is capable of purposeful action without failure. Findings This paper has shown that shown that, although many aspects of the management of this construction project such as its decision‐making processes were very effective, the project was over budget and significantly late. Analysis using systems thinking has been able to reveal that the problems encountered during the construction were caused by unforeseen environmental influences and failure to appreciate the viewpoints of those directly and indirectly affected by the project. It is suggested that the lessons learned from investigating this project in real time can provide a valuable insight into understanding the challenges faced by similar projects. Originality/value Unlike many reports of similar‐sized projects, this case study uses data gathered throughout the life of a lengthy construction project. It uses these data to conduct an assessment of project performance and evaluate the way the project was managed. The method used to do this is transferable to a wide variety of design and engineering projects and is of value to academics and practitioners alike.