2015/10/02 by Tim Stapleton · 2 citations
Social Sciences · #African studies and sociopolitical issues #African history and culture studies #Tracking (education) #Indigenous #Insurgency #Context (archaeology) #State (computer science) #Small arms #Political science #Geography #Political economy #Law #Sociology #Politics #Computer science #Business #Archaeology #Ecology
paper · doi:10.1080/07292473.2015.1128658
openalex publication_date 2015/10/02 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
Tracking, the skill of following a subject by signs left behind in the environment, dominated the experience of state forces and insurgents during Southern Africa’s late twentieth-century guerilla conflicts; particularly in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) from 1965 to 1980 and South African occupied South-West Africa (now Namibia) from 1966 to 1989. Rhodesian and South African forces emphasised tracking to locate and eliminate their elusive enemies, and learned that the only way to do this was by using horses, motor vehicles or helicopters to gain ground. Both security forces established tracking training institutions and specialist tracker units. However, only the South Africans were able to create large and highly effective tracking units in the context of a specific environment and the mobilisation of indigenous communities. In response, insurgents in both conflicts shifted their activities to areas less conducive to tracking and developed anti-tracking techniques. Despite the failure of these counter-insurgency campaigns to win the ‘hearts and minds’ of the civilian African majority, their attempts to use tracking to engage insurgents can provide useful lessons.