2018/07/09 by Daniel Talbot, Evelyn Smith, John Cass +1 · 40 citations
Psychology · #Eating Disorders and Behaviors #Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies #Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior #Psychology #Rating scale #Ideal (ethics) #Scale (ratio) #Matrix (chemical analysis) #Social psychology #Developmental psychology #Geography #Cartography
paper · doi:10.1037/men0000165
published in Psychology of Men & Masculinity 20(3), 356-367 (American Psychological Association)
openalex publication_date 2018/07/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/01
This study aimed to develop and examine the validity evidence of the New Somatomorphic Matrix-Male (NSM-M) as a measure of actual-ideal body discrepancy. The NSM-M is a visual matrix of 34 male bodies that vary along two dimensions: body fat percentage (range = 4-40%) and muscularity (fat-free mass index; range = 16.5-30 kg/m2; 36.4-66.1 lbs/m2). In Study 1, participants were 2,733 sexual minority males recruited via a geosocial networking smartphone application. Participants selected their actual and ideal bodies on the NSM-M and additionally completed questionnaires measuring body dissatisfaction, eating disorder symptoms, quality of life, and anabolic steroid use. In Study 2, participants were 33 males from a community sample. They completed the NSM-M across two sessions, 7-14 days apart. NSM-M scores demonstrated concurrent and convergent validity as a measure of male body dissatisfaction. In addition, NSM-M scores discriminated between steroid users and nonusers, and between body mass index categories. The NSM-M also demonstrated sound test-retest reliability across a 7- to 14-day period. In sum, the NSM-M is validated figural measure of male actual-ideal body discrepancy with notable strengths, including fast administration time and enhanced ecological validity.