2019/12/31 by Naomi Lloyd‐Jones · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Scottish History and National Identity #Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes #Political and Economic history of UK and US #Politics #Dominance (genetics) #Appeal #Rhetoric #Scholarship #Narrative #Political science #General election #Home rule #Liberalism #Sociology #Political economy #Public administration #Law
paper · doi:10.1093/hisres/htz009
openalex publication_date 2019/12/31 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
Abstract Largely ignored as an anomaly, the 1892 general election represents a major gap in the scholarship on late nineteenth-century British politics. This article is the first to analyse the issues on and electioneering rhetoric with which it was fought, with a focus on England’s constituencies. It argues that the early 1890s saw the inauguration of a new, ‘positive’ kind of political appeal. It explores how Liberals embraced the radical reforms of the National Liberal Federation’s ‘Newcastle programme’ and how Unionists constructed a self-referential ‘positive Unionism’ that trumpeted their achievements in government. In addition, by considering the limits of Home Rule as an electoral strategy, the article challenges accepted narratives of Liberalism’s slide into ‘faddism’ and Unionist dominance. The article draws on my databases of election addresses. Addresses were an essential medium for the communication of political appeals; by analysing their content, the article highlights the utility of quantitative methodologies for studying shifts in and the transmission of political discourses.