2021/10/05 by Nguyễn Thanh Thanh Huyền, Minh‐Hoang Nguyen, Tam-Tri Le +2 · 1 citation
Decision Sciences · Social Sciences · Psychology · #scientometrics and bibliometrics research #Diversity and Career in Medicine #Publishing #Open access publishing #Disadvantage #Diversity (politics) #Transgender #Gender diversity #Gender bias #Sociology #Political science #Social science #Library science #Psychology #Gender studies #Social psychology #Computer science #Law #Anthropology
paper · pdf · doi:10.3390/publications9040045
openalex publication_date 2021/10/05 · openalex created_date 2021/10/11 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Open access (OA) publishing is beneficial for researchers to improve recognition, representation, and visibility in academia. However, few studies have been conducted for studying the association between gender and OA publishing likelihood. Therefore, the current study explores the impacts of gender-based authorship structures on OA publishing in Vietnamese social sciences and humanities. Bayesian analysis was performed on a dataset of 3122 publications in social sciences and humanities. We found that publications with mixed-gender authorship were most likely to be published under Gold Access terms (26.31–31.65%). In contrast, the likelihood of publications with the solely male or female author(s) was lower. It is also notable that if female researcher(s) held the first-author position in an article of mixed-gender authorship, the publication would be less likely to be published under Gold Access terms (26.31% compared to 31.65% of male-first-author structure). In addition, publications written by a solo female author (14.19%) or a group of female authors (10.72%) had lower OA publishing probabilities than those written by a solely male author(s) (17.14%). These findings hint at the possible advantage of gender diversity and the disadvantage of gender homophily (especially female-only authorship) on OA publishing likelihood. Moreover, they show there might be some negative impacts of gender inequality on OA publishing. As a result, the notion of gender diversity, financial and policy supports are recommended to promote the open science movement.