vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Influence of aerobic fitness and body fatness on tolerance to uncompensable heat stress

2001/11/01 by Glen A. Selkirk, Tom M. McLellan · 1 citation
Medicine · #Thermoregulation and physiological responses #Sports Performance and Training #Exercise and Physiological Responses #Aerobic exercise #Physical fitness #Aerobic capacity #VO2 max #Lean body mass #Internal medicine #Body weight #Heart rate #Body fat percentage #Endocrinology #Animal science #Obesity #Medicine #Physical therapy #Biology #Blood pressure

paper · doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.5.2055

openalex publication_date 2001/11/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

This study examined the independent and combined importance of aerobic fitness and body fatness on physiological tolerance and exercise time during weight-bearing exercise while wearing a semipermeable protective ensemble. Twenty-four men and women were matched for aerobic fitness and body fatness in one of four groups (4 men and 2 women in each group). Aerobic fitness was expressed per kilogram of lean body mass (LBM) to eliminate the influence of body fatness on the expression of fitness. Subjects were defined as trained (T; regularly active with a peak aerobic power of 65 ml x kg LBM(-1) x min(-1)) or untrained (UT; sedentary with a peak aerobic power of 53 ml x kg LBM(-1) x min(-1)) with high (High; 20%) or low (Low; 11%) body fatness. Subjects exercised until exhaustion or until rectal temperature reached 39.5 degrees C or heart rate reached 95% of maximum. Exercise times were significantly greater in T(Low) (116 +/- 6.5 min) compared with their matched sedentary (UT(Low); 70 +/- 3.6 min) or fatness (T(High); 82 +/- 3.9 min) counterparts, indicating an advantage for both a high aerobic fitness and low body fatness. However, similar effects were not evident between T(High) and UT(High) (74 +/- 4.1 min) or between the UT groups (UT(Low) and UT(High)). The major advantage attributed to a higher aerobic fitness was the ability to tolerate a higher core temperature at exhaustion (the difference being as great as 0.9 degrees C), whereas both body fatness and rate of heat storage affected the exercise time as independent factors.

Citations

Cited by