2007/04/24 by Stephen Wroe, Nicholas Milne · 8 citations
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Evolution and Paleontology Studies #Morphological variations and asymmetry #Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology #Biology #Marsupial #Carnivore #Skull #Convergent evolution #Range (aeronautics) #Evolutionary biology #Brain size #Ecology #Zoology #Ecomorphology #Phylogenetics #Habitat #Paleontology
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00101.x
openalex publication_date 2007/04/24 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
Phenotypic similarities between distantly related marsupials and placentals are commonly presented as examples of convergence and support for the role of adaptive evolution in shaping morphological and ecological diversity. Here we compare skull shape in a wide range of carnivoran placentals (Carnivora) and nonherbivorous marsupials using a three-dimensional (3-D) geometric morphometric approach. Morphological and ecological diversity among extant carnivorans is considerably greater than is evident in the marsupial order Dasyuromorphia with which they have most commonly been compared. To examine convergence across a wider, but broadly comparable range of feeding ecologies, a dataset inclusive of nondasyuromorphian marsupials and extinct taxa representing morphotypes no longer present was assembled. We found support for the adaptive paradigm, with correlations between morphology, feeding behavior, and bite force, although skull shape better predicted feeding ecology in the phylogenetically diverse marsupial sample than in carnivorans. However, we also show that remarkably consistent but differing constraints have influenced the evolution of cranial shape in both groups. These differences between carnivorans and marsupials, which correlate with brain size and bite force, are maintained across the full gamut of morphologies and feeding categories, from small insectivores and omnivores to large meat-specialists.