2014/06/05 by Viktoria Akchurina, Anita Lavorgna · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Psychology · Engineering · #Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence #Political Conflict and Governance #Crime Patterns and Interventions #Nexus (standard) #Institutionalisation #Terrorism #Commit #Political science #Threat assessment #Indigenous #Criminology #Neglect #Violent extremism #Central asia #Geography #Sociology #Psychology #Engineering #Law
paper · doi:10.1080/17440572.2014.924406
openalex publication_date 2014/06/05 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
Existing threat assessment analyses of crime and terrorism rely on a series of indicators, first and foremost violence. However, these approaches tend to neglect local specificities. In Central Asia and especially in the Fergana Valley, there are radical groups that do not necessarily commit violent behaviour, but yet represent a threat for both their operational areas and the international community. How can the threat of radicalisation be assessed when violence is not a characterising element, and what processes and structures should be taken into consideration to this end? Based on primary data collected during field research, this article challenges conventional threat assessments and the crime–terrorism nexus by looking at how the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and Hizb-ut-Tahrir have infiltrated indigenous social structures. This analysis suggests that the nature of security threats in Central Asia needs to be reconsidered by focusing on the informal institutionalisation of radicalisation, and it proposes the use of alternative threat assessment indicators.