2018/04/03 by Dušan Borić, Bryan Hanks, Duško Šljivar +5 · 1 citation
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Social Sciences · #Archaeology and ancient environmental studies #Archaeological Research and Protection #Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology #Prehistory #Human settlement #Abandonment (legal) #Context (archaeology) #Archaeology #Ideology #Excavation #History #Settlement (finance) #Geography #Narrative #Ethnology #Politics #Political science #Art
paper · doi:10.1086/697534
openalex publication_date 2018/04/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02
Interpretations of prehistoric enclosures worldwide have varied from those that see the primary role of enclosures as defensive features to others that explore the symbolic, ritual, social, and ideological dimensions of separating space into an inside, an outside, and an in-between. Such evidence and interpretative accounts are inevitably linked to wider anthropological discussions on modes of social interaction and reproduction in the past, whether altruistic or predatory, and evolutionary narratives regarding changes in the level of intergroup violence over the course of human history. Growing evidence indicates that many Neolithic settlements in Europe were enclosed by a complex system of ditches, ramparts, and palisades. We present a case study from the central Balkans at the Neolithic Vinča culture site of Oreškovica-Selište in Serbia, dated to the last centuries of the sixth millennium BC, where recent geophysical surveys, stratigraphic excavation, and accelerator mass spectrometry dating document the existence of an early enclosed settlement with multiple enclosure features. We interpret these features as defensive and discuss the social dynamics that led to the founding and abandonment of this short-lived occupation in the context of other contemporaneous settlements in the Balkans.