vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Reconciling deep learning with symbolic artificial intelligence: representing objects and relations

2019/01/04 by Marta Garnelo, Murray Shanahan · 1 citation
Computer Science · Social Sciences · Psychology · Mathematics · #Topic Modeling #Language and cultural evolution #Neural Networks and Applications #Connectionism #Artificial intelligence #Computer science #Field (mathematics) #Symbolic artificial intelligence #Deep learning #Key (lock) #Strengths and weaknesses #Cognitive science #Artificial neural network #The Symbolic #Artificial Intelligence System #Epistemology #Psychology #Mathematics #Philosophy

paper · pdf · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.010

openalex publication_date 2019/01/04 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

In the history of the quest for human-level artificial intelligence, a number of rival paradigms have vied for supremacy. Symbolic artificial intelligence was dominant for much of the 20th century, but currently a connectionist paradigm is in the ascendant, namely machine learning with deep neural networks. However, both paradigms have strengths and weaknesses, and a significant challenge for the field today is to effect a reconciliation. A central tenet of the symbolic paradigm is that intelligence results from the manipulation of abstract compositional representations whose elements stand for objects and relations. If this is correct, then a key objective for deep learning is to develop architectures capable of discovering objects and relations in raw data, and learning how to represent them in ways that are useful for downstream processing. This short review highlights recent progress in this direction.

Citations

Cited by

Related