2011/06/01 by Rachel A. Fleming‐May · 18 citations
Social Sciences · Computer Science · Psychology · #Library Science and Administration #Library Collection Development and Digital Resources #Information Retrieval and Search Behavior #Typology #Meaning (existential) #Sociology #Computer science #Academic library #Library science #Formal concept analysis #Discipline #Knowledge management #Data science #Psychology #Social science
paper · doi:10.1086/660133
published in The Library Quarterly 81(3), 297-320 (University of Chicago Press)
openalex publication_date 2011/06/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
The “use” of library resources and services is frequently presented in library and information science (LIS) literature as a primitive concept: an idea that need not be defined when it is being measured as an operational variable in empirical research. This project considered representations of library use through the Evolutionary Concept Analysis (ECA) method, developed by nursing scholar Beth L. Rodgers to explore the significance of concepts within specific disciplinary, chronological, and theoretical contexts. Analysis of a 200-item sample of the LIS journal literature revealed that “use” is not a monolithic concept but, in fact, has multiple facets of meaning that are deployed in diverse contexts across the LIS publication spectrum. In addition to reviewing key discussions of library use in the LIS literature, this article presents a typology of its conceptual facets.