Roots of the Rorschach controversy

2004/12/16 by Howard N. Garb, James M. Wood, Scott O. Lilienfeld +2 · 1 citation
Medicine · Psychology · #Cognitive psychology #Epistemology #External validity #Medical and Biological Sciences #Normative #Popularity #Psychological Testing and Assessment #Psychology #Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications #Rebuttal #Rorschach test #Social psychology #Variety (cybernetics)

paper · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.09.002

openalex publication_date 2004/12/16 · crossref created 2004/12/16 · crossref issued 2005/01/01 · crossref published 2005/01/01 · crossref published-print 2005/01/01 · crossref deposited 2025/10/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/03/05 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/15

Citations

• Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility.
• A Critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques"
• The hard science of Rorschach research: What do we know and where do we go?
• Call for a Moratorium on the Use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in Clinical and Forensic Settings
• Does Early Psychological Intervention Promote Recovery From Posttraumatic Stress?
• Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis.

Cited by

• Rorschach test [wikipedia]