vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

What explains the failure of U.S. army reconstruction in Afghanistan?

2018/07/03 by Colin Robinson · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Engineering · #Military History and Strategy #Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East #Intelligence, Security, War Strategy #Political science #Aeronautics #Computer security #Computer science #Geology #Engineering

paper · doi:10.1080/14751798.2018.1500756

openalex publication_date 2018/07/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06

Abstract

This author wrote his doctorate thesis on post-conflict army reconstruction, submitting it in 2011. Continued research on the subject in the intervening seven years indicates that his theoretical propositions can be refined and improved. This article examines refinements to the model, and then applies those refinements in detail to the Afghan case. In so doing, it shifts the focus from potentially altruistic state-building to a case that was driven by pure national-strategic interests. Issues surrounding the liberal peace ideology dominate recent army reconstruction in conflict-affected states. The liberal peace underpinning is of supreme importance, so much so that in many discussions, it is internalised and accepted virtually without thought. This paper will advance the body of knowledge by establishing, for the first time, a theoretical basis for the widespread failure of army reconstruction in Afghanistan. The empirical basis builds on extensive previous research by other scholars. The resulting model can also be applied to better explain outcomes in other similar cases.

Cited by

Related