2016/12/06 by Alexei Kassian · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #Eurasian Exchange Networks #Ancient Near East History #Linguistics and language evolution #Decipherment #Greeks #Ancient Greek #Pottery #Natural (archaeology) #Ancient art #Classics #Ancient history #Meaning (existential) #History #Literature #Art #Archaeology #Philosophy
paper · doi:10.1163/15700577-12341301
openalex publication_date 2016/12/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
A large number of Ancient Greek vases dated to the 1st millennium bc contain short inscriptions. Normally, these represent names of craftsmen or names and descriptions of the depicted characters and objects. The majority of inscriptions are understandable in Ancient Greek, but there is a substantial number of abracadabra words whose meaning and morphological structure remain vague. Recently an interdisciplinary team (Mayor et alii 2014) came up with the idea that some of the nonsense inscriptions associated with Amazons and Scythians are actually written in ancient Abkhaz-Adyghe languages. The idea is promising since in the first half of the 1st millennium bc the Greeks initiated the process of active expansion in the Black Sea region, so it is natural to suppose that contacts with autochthonous peoples might be reflected in Greek art. Unfortunately, detailed examination suggests that the proposed Abkhaz-Adyghe decipherment is semantically and morphologically ad hoc , containing a number of inaccuracies and errors of various kinds. The methodological and factual flaws are so substantial that it makes Mayor et alii ’s results improbable.