2018/01/25 by Marlee A. Tucker, Katrin Böhning‐Gaese, William F. Fagan +97 · 2 citations
Environmental Science · Medicine · #Anthropocene #Astrobiology #Biology #Earth science #Environmental ethics #Environmental science #Geography #Geology #Paleontology #Philosophy #Wildlife Ecology and Conservation #Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation #Zoonotic diseases and public health
paper · doi:10.1126/science.aam9712
openalex publication_date 2018/01/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Animal movement is fundamental for ecosystem functioning and species survival, yet the effects of the anthropogenic footprint on animal movements have not been estimated across species. Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, we found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in areas with a low human footprint. We attribute this reduction to behavioral changes of individual animals and to the exclusion of species with long-range movements from areas with higher human impact. Global loss of vagility alters a key ecological trait of animals that affects not only population persistence but also ecosystem processes such as predator-prey interactions, nutrient cycling, and disease transmission.