2012/07/01 by Lawrence J. Mykytiuk · 2 citations
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Biblical Studies and Interpretation #Religion and Society Interactions #Development, Ethics, and Society #Historicity (philosophy) #Perspective (graphical) #Subject (documents) #Philosophy #Miller #Epistemology #Hebrew #Classics #Israelites #Sociology #Literature #History #Theology #Law #Art #Computer science #Politics
paper · doi:10.1080/10477845.2012.673111
openalex publication_date 2012/07/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
In this series of articles the author covers scholarly works in English which can, at least potentially, be associated with a positive view of biblical historicity regarding the periods preceding the Israelites’ return from exile. Part 2 covers works that treat the concepts and methodological issues at the center of the maximalist–minimalist debate. Parts 3–5 will cover works on evidences. In this article, the first half of Part 2, the author focuses on works that provide a framework in which there exists the realistic possibility for large amounts of Hebrew Scripture to stand as valid historical source material—while still subject to comparison with other sources. These works are by J. Maxwell Miller and John H. Hayes, Megan Bishop Moore, Lester L. Grabbe, James Barr, Bob Becking, Amihai Mazar, Hans M. Barstad, Ronald S. Hendel, and Mark S. Smith. The article leads up to this focus by beginning with bibliographic selections in earlier works, works that offer long-term perspectives, and a summary of good effects and misguided aspects of minimalist publications. In Part 2.2 the author will discuss works on methodology by authors who espouse biblical historicity unless it is proven wrong.