vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

The Materiality of Reading

2006/06/01 by David Bleich · 1 citation
Psychology · Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #Language, Metaphor, and Cognition #Media, Communication, and Education #Rhetoric and Communication Studies #Materiality (auditing) #Reading (process) #Feeling #Perspective (graphical) #Nominalism #Epistemology #Interpretation (philosophy) #Aesthetics #Philosophy #Affect (linguistics) #Sociology #Linguistics #Art #Visual arts

paper · doi:10.1353/nlh.2006.0000

openalex publication_date 2006/06/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21

Abstract

Reading and other meditative activities affect bodily functions and feelings because reading is a material practice. Its social forms derive from the materiality of language, a perspective derived from the Nominalist tradition that has been recently reread by Wittgenstein, Austin, Bakhtin, Whorf, Kristeva, Derrida, and others. In this sense of reading and interpretation, abstractions and generalizations are provisional, applicable in local and instrumental contexts rather than as scientific laws or permanent truths. To read is to describe and/or re-say, while explanation is understood to be a pragmatic action rather than a fixing of knowledge.

Citations

Cited by