2011/05/16 by Kingsley Bolton · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics #Socioeconomic Development in Asia #Diaspora, migration, transnational identity #Colonialism #Language planning #Applied linguistics #Political science #State (computer science) #History #Sociology #Linguistics #Law #Philosophy #Computer science
paper · doi:10.1515/9783110239331.51
openalex publication_date 2011/05/16 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
Hong Kong ceased to be a colony of Britain on June 30th, 1997, thus entering a new stage of its development and evolution as a uniquely-constituted city state and urban metropolis. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (HKSAR) inherited a linguistic ecology that owed much to its previous existence as a British colony, where the Chinese language had had no de jure status until 1974. From 1995, the stated policy of government has been to promote a “biliterate” (Chinese and English) and “trilingual” (Cantonese, Putonghua and English) society, and various measures have also been taken to promote the use of Chinese as a medium of instruction in schools. Immediately after the change in sovereignty, Putonghua became a compulsory school subject for the first time. This paper will examine the issue of language planning and policies partly froman historical perspective, but also through a consideration of current policies and practices across a range of domains, including government, law and education. One major conclusion that emerges from this discussion is that, from a language policy perspective, the relationship between Chinese and English in the Hong Kong context is potentially far less contentious than that between Cantonese and Putonghua.