2021/08/23 by Richard T. Johnson · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Psychology · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Political and Economic history of UK and US #Policy Transfer and Learning #Extension (predicate logic) #Blame #Voting #Bureaucracy #Alliance #Political science #Scholarship #Politics #Law and economics #Law #Public administration #Sociology #Social psychology #Psychology
paper · doi:10.1017/s0898588x21000079
openalex publication_date 2021/08/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02
Abstract Republican support for the 1982 Voting Rights Act (VRA) extension is a puzzle for scholars of racial policy coalitions. The extension contained provisions that were manifestly antithetical to core principles of the “color-blind” policy alliance said to dominate the GOP. Recent scholarship has explained this puzzling decision by arguing that conservatives were confident that the VRA's most objectionable provisions could be undone by the federal bureaucracy and judiciary, while absolving Republicans of the blame of being against voting rights. This article suggests that the picture is more complicated. Applying the concept of “critical junctures” to the 1982 VRA extension, the article highlights the importance of actors’ contingent decisions and reveals a wider range of choices available to political entrepreneurs than has been conventionally understood. Highlighting differing views within the Reagan administration, this article also identifies a wider range of reasons why Republicans supported the act's extension, including career ambition, party-building, policy agenda advancement, and genuine commitment, rather than simply a defensive stance as implied by recent histories.