vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Systematic review of severity scales and screening instruments for tics: Critique and recommendations

2017/01/10 by Davide Martino, Tamara Pringsheim, Andrea E. Cavanna +8 · 3 citations
Psychology · Medicine · #Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders #Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies #Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments #Tics #Tourette syndrome #Psychology #Rating scale #Psychiatry #Movement disorders #Clinical Global Impression #Clinical psychology #Autism spectrum disorder #Autism #Medicine #Developmental psychology #Alternative medicine

paper · doi:10.1002/mds.26891

openalex publication_date 2017/01/10 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several clinician, informant, and self-report instruments for tics and associated phenomena have been developed that differ in construct, comprehensiveness, and ease of administration. OBJECTIVE: A Movement Disorders Society subcommittee aimed to rate psychometric quality of severity and screening instruments for tics and related sensory phenomena. METHODS: Following the methodology adopted by previous Movement Disorders Society subcommittee papers, a review of severity and screening instruments for tics was completed, applying a classification as "recommended," "suggested," or "listed" to each instrument. RESULTS: A total of 5 severity scales (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, Tourette Syndrome Clinical Global Impression, Tourette's Disorder Scale, Shapiro Tourette syndrome Severity Scale, Premonitory Urges for Tics Scale) were "recommended," and 6 (Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale, Motor tic, Obsessions and compulsions, Vocal tic Evaluation Survey, Tourette Syndrome Global Scale, Global Tic Rating Scale, Parent Tic Questionnaire, Tourette Syndrome Symptom List) were "suggested." A total of 2 screening instruments (Motor tic, Obsession and compulsions, Vocal tic Evaluation Survey and Autism-Tics, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Other Comorbidities Inventory) were "recommended," whereas 2 others (Apter 4-questions screening and Proxy Report Questionnaire for Parents and Teachers) were "suggested." CONCLUSIONS: Our review does not support the need for developing new tic severity or screening instruments. Potential objectives of future research include developing a rating instrument targeting the full spectrum of tic-related abnormal behaviors, assessing/screening malignant forms of tic disorders, and developing patient-reported outcome measures. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Citations

Cited by

Related