2016/10/27 by Justin T.A. Busch, Rachel E. Watson‐Jones, Cristine H. Legare · 56 citations
Psychology · Neuroscience · #Child and Animal Learning Development #Cultural Differences and Values #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Psychology #Context (archaeology) #Natural (archaeology) #Explanatory model #Existentialism #Developmental psychology #Social psychology #Epistemology #Geography
paper · open access · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12164
published in British Journal of Developmental Psychology 35(1), 4-20 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2016/10/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
People across highly diverse cultural contexts use both natural and supernatural explanations to explain questions of fundamental concern such as death, illness, and human origins. The present study examines the development of explanatory coexistence within and across domains of existential concern in individuals in Tanna, Vanuatu. We examined three age groups: 7- to 12-year-old children, 13- to 18-year-old adolescents, and 19- to 70-year-old adults (N = 72). Within the domain of death, biological and spontaneous explanations were most common across all ages. For illness, children showed the highest rates of explanatory coexistence, while adolescents and adults favoured biological explanations. Within the human origins domain, theistic explanations were most common across the age groups. Overall, these data show that coexistence reasoning in these domains is pervasive across cultures, yet at the same time it is deeply contextually specific, reflecting the nuanced differences in local ecologies and cultural beliefs. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Individuals across highly diverse cultural contexts use both natural and supernatural explanations to understand the events that occur in their lives. Context and cultural input play a large role in determining when and how individuals incorporate natural and supernatural explanations. The development of explanatory coexistence has primarily studied explanations for isolated domains. What does this study add? We examined explanatory coexistence in a culture with recent conversion to Christianity and formal education. The current research examines how individuals reason within and across the domains of human origins, illness, and death. Developmental differences associated with explanatory coexistence are examined.