vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Critical Naïveté?

2013/08/01 by Peter Brickey LeQuire, Daniel Silver · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #Religion and Society Interactions #Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices #Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment #Secularization #Politics #Protestantism #Epistemology #Sociology #Set (abstract data type) #Social science #Philosophy #Political science #Religious studies #Law

paper · doi:10.1017/s0003975613000143

openalex publication_date 2013/08/01 · openalex created_date 2021/02/01 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30

Abstract

Abstract Between 1940 and 1944, sociologist Talcott Parsons and political scientist Eric Voegelin engaged in a vigorous correspondence, discussing the origins of totalitarianism and modern anti-Semitism, the legacy of Max Weber, patterns of secularization set in motion by the Protestant Reformation, the methodology and goals of social science, and more. This article introduces and explicates the surprisingly amicable and intellectually rich exchange between these two seemingly different thinkers. Although the letters hold obvious historical interest, their variegated topics are also closely thematically related, revealing an inner logic that we interpret as a theoretical search for “critical naïveté”. This logic, we argue, is relevant to contemporary discussions about the social, political, and scientific legacies of world-transcendent spiritual traditions.

Citations

Cited by

Related