2013/01/31 by Kun Chen, Yuan Huang, Youjin Deng +6 · 123 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Antiferromagnetism #Critical point (mathematics) #Heisenberg model #Mesoscopic physics #Physics #Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism #Quantum #Quantum critical point #Quantum many-body systems #Quantum mechanics #Quantum phase transition #Scale invariance #Statistical physics #Theoretical and Computational Physics #Theoretical physics #cond-mat.stat-mech #cond-mat.str-el #hep-lat
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.185701
published in Physical Review Letters 110(18), 185701 (American Physical Society) · 5 pages, 5 figures
openalex publication_date 2013/05/03 · arxiv created 2013/05/06 · arxiv updated 2016/11/04 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Quantum transition points in the J-Q model--the test bed of the deconfined critical point theory--and the SU(2)-symmetric discrete noncompact CP(1) representation of the deconfined critical action are directly compared by the flowgram method. We find that the flows of two systems coincide in a broad region of linear system sizes (10 < L < 50 for the J-Q model), implying that the deconfined critical point theory correctly captures the mesoscopic physics of competition between the antiferromagnetic and valence-bond orders in quantum spin systems. At larger sizes, however, we observe significant deviations between the two flows which both demonstrate strong violations of scale invariance. This reliably rules out the second-order transition scenario in at least one of the two models and suggests the most likely explanation for the nature of the transition in the J-Q model.