2016/09/23 by Bartomeu Monserrat, Richard J. Needs, R. J. Needs +2
Chemistry · Earth and Planetary Sciences · Materials Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Chemistry #Crystal structure #Crystallography #Crystallography and molecular interactions #Diffraction #Hexagonal crystal system #Hexagonal phase #High-pressure geophysics and materials #Hydrogen #Materials science #Monoclinic crystal system #Optics #Phase (matter) #Physics #Raman spectroscopy #Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography #X-ray crystallography #cond-mat.mtrl-sci
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.134101
published as Phys. Rev. B 94, 134101 (2016) · 7 pages, 5 figures
arxiv created 2016/09/23 · openalex publication_date 2016/10/03 · arxiv updated 2016/11/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
A hexagonal structure of solid molecular hydrogen with P6122 symmetry is calculated to be more stable below about 200 GPa than the monoclinic C2/c structure identified previously as the best candidate for phase III. We find that the effects of nuclear quantum and thermal vibrations play a central role in the stabilization of P6122. The P6122 and C2/c structures are very similar and their Raman and infrared data are in good agreement with experiment. However, our calculations show that the hexagonal P6122 structure provides better agreement with the available x-ray diffraction data than the C2/c structure at pressures below about 200 GPa. We suggest that two phase-III-like structures may be formed at high pressures: hexagonal P6122 below about 200 GPa and monoclinic C2/c at higher pressures.