vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

An analysis of mixed integer linear sets based on lattice point free convex sets

2009/06/29 by Kent Andersen, Andersen, Kent, Quentin Louveaux +3
Computer Science · Mathematics · #90C10 (Secondary) #90C11 (Primary) #Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research #Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation #FOS: Mathematics #Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems #Optimization and Control (math.OC) #math.OC #msc:90C10 #msc:90C11

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0906.5212

arxiv created 2009/06/29 · openalex publication_date 2009/06/29 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Split cuts are cutting planes for mixed integer programs whose validity is derived from maximal lattice point free polyhedra of the form S:=\x : π0 ≤ πT x ≤ π0+1 \ called split sets. The set obtained by adding all split cuts is called the split closure, and the split closure is known to be a polyhedron. A split set S has max-facet-width equal to one in the sense that max\πT x : x ∈ S \-min\πT x : x ∈ S \ ≤ 1. In this paper we consider using general lattice point free rational polyhedra to derive valid cuts for mixed integer linear sets. We say that lattice point free polyhedra with max-facet-width equal to w have width size w. A split cut of width size w is then a valid inequality whose validity follows from a lattice point free rational polyhedron of width size w. The w-th split closure is the set obtained by adding all valid inequalities of width size at most w. Our main result is a sufficient condition for the addition of a family of rational inequalities to result in a polyhedral relaxation. We then show that a corollary is that the w-th split closure is a polyhedron. Given this result, a natural question is which width size w^* is required to design a finite cutting plane proof for the validity of an inequality. Specifically, for this value w^*, a finite cutting plane proof exists that uses lattice point free rational polyhedra of width size at most w^*, but no finite cutting plane proof that only uses lattice point free rational polyhedra of width size smaller than w^*. We characterize w^* based on the faces of the linear relaxation.

Related