2016/09/15 by Piotr Blaszczyk, Vladimir Kanovei, Karin U. Katz +3 · 1 citation
Mathematics · #math.HO #math.CA #math.LO #msc:01A85 #msc:01A45 #msc:01A50 #msc:01A55 #msc:01A60 #msc:26E35
paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3
30 pages, to appear in Foundations of Science
arxiv created 2016/09/15 · arxiv updated 2016/09/16
Abraham Robinson's framework for modern infinitesimals was developed half a century ago. It enables a re-evaluation of the procedures of the pioneers of mathematical analysis. Their procedures have been often viewed through the lens of the success of the Weierstrassian foundations. We propose a view without passing through the lens, by means of proxies for such procedures in the modern theory of infinitesimals. The real accomplishments of calculus and analysis had been based primarily on the elaboration of novel techniques for solving problems rather than a quest for ultimate foundations. It may be hopeless to interpret historical foundations in terms of a punctiform continuum, but arguably it is possible to interpret historical techniques and procedures in terms of modern ones. Our proposed formalisations do not mean that Fermat, Gregory, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy were pre-Robinsonians, but rather indicate that Robinson's framework is more helpful in understanding their procedures than a Weierstrassian framework.