1995/11/29 by Simon P. Driver, Rogier A. Windhorst, S. Phillipps +3 · 28 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Astrophysics #Cosmological constant #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Elliptical galaxy #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Galaxy #Galaxy formation and evolution #Hubble's law #Lenticular galaxy #Luminosity #Physics #Population #Redshift #Surface brightness #Surface brightness fluctuation #Theoretical physics #Universe #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1086/177079
published in The Astrophysical Journal 461, 525 (IOP Publishing) · Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal (April, 1996). 34 pages (including 4 figures) of gzip compressed and uuencoded PS. Also available at http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~spd/bib.html
arxiv created 1995/11/29 · openalex publication_date 1996/04/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · arxiv updated 2016/08/30 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
The interpretation of galaxy number counts in terms of cosmological models is fraught with difficulty because of uncertainties in the overall galaxy population (mix of morphological types, luminosity functions, etc.) and in the observations (loss of low surface brightness images, image blending, etc.). Many of these can be overcome if we use deep high- resolution imaging of a single class of high surface brightness galaxies, whose evolution is thought to be fairly well understood. This is now possible by selecting elliptical and S0 galaxies using Hubble Space Telescope images from the Medium Deep Survey and other ultradeep Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 images. In the present paper, we examine whether such data can be used to discriminate between open and closed universes, or between conventional cosmological models and those dominated by a cosmological constant. We find, based on the currently available data, that unless elliptical galaxies undergo very strong merging since z ~ 1 (and/or very large errors exist in the morphological classifications), then flat models dominated by a cosmological constant are ruled out. However, both an Einstein-de Sitter (OMEGA0_ = 1) model with standard passive stellar evolution and an open (OMEGA0_ = 0.05) model with no net evolution (i.e., canceling stellar and dynamical evolution) predict virtually identical elliptical and S0 galaxy counts. Based on these findings and the recent reportings of H0_ ~ 80 km s- 1^ Mpc-1^, we find that the maximum acceptable age of the universe is 13.3 Gyr, and a value of <= 9 Gyr is favored. A flat (LAMBDA not equal to 0) universe is therefore not a viable solution to the H0_/globular cluster age problem.