vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Precision comparison of the power spectrum in the EFTofLSS with simulations

2015/07/31 by Simon Foreman, Hideki Perrier, H. Perrier +1 · 4 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Cosmological perturbation theory #Cosmology #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Dark energy #Effective field theory #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Galaxy #Inflation (cosmology) #Matter power spectrum #Overfitting #Parametrization (atmospheric modeling) #Perturbation (astronomy) #Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) #Physics #Quadratic equation #Quantum mechanics #Redshift #Regularization (linguistics) #Spectral density #Statistical physics #Statistics #Tensor (intrinsic definition) #Theoretical physics #astro-ph.CO #gr-qc #hep-ph #hep-th

paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/027

v2: JCAP published version, added comments and explanations

openalex publication_date 2016/05/11 · arxiv created 2016/06/21 · arxiv updated 2016/06/22 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

We study the prediction of the dark matter power spectrum at two-loop order in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures (EFTofLSS) using high precision numerical simulations. In our universe, short distance non-linear fluctuations, not under perturbative control, affect long distance fluctuations through an effective stress tensor that needs to be parametrized in terms of counterterms that are functions of the long distance fluctuating fields. We find that at two-loop order it is necessary to include three counterterms: a linear term in the overdensity, δ, a quadratic term, δ 2 , and a higher derivative term, ∂ 2 δ. After the inclusion of these three terms, the EFTofLSS at two-loop order matches simulation data up to k ≃ 0.34 h Mpc −1 at redshift z = 0, up to k ≃ 0.55 h Mpc −1 at z = 1, and up to k ≃ 1.1 h Mpc −1 at z = 2. At these wavenumbers, the cosmic variance of the simulation is at least as small as 10 −3 , providing for the first time a high precision comparison between theory and data. The actual reach of the theory is affected by theoretical uncertainties associated to not having included higher order terms in perturbation theory, for which we provide an estimate, and by potentially overfitting the data, which we also try to address. Since in the EFTofLSS the coupling constants associated with the counterterms are unknown functions of time, we show how a simple parametrization gives a sensible description of their time-dependence. Overall, the k -reach of the EFTofLSS is much larger than previous analytical techniques, showing that the amount of cosmological information amenable to high-precision analytical control might be much larger than previously believed.

Citations

Cited by