2014/05/31 by Dmitry Gourevitch, Siddhartha Sahi, Eitan Sayag · 6 citations
Mathematics · #Advanced Algebra and Geometry #Advanced Topics in Algebra #Algebra over a field #Discrete mathematics #Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology #Invariant (physics) #Mathematical physics #Mathematics #Pure mathematics #Unitary state #math.RT #msc:20G05 #msc:20G20 #msc:22E45 #msc:46T30
paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s00031-015-9345-6
published in Transformation Groups 20(4), 1023-1042 (Birkhäuser) · 14 pages. v4: minor corrections in Theorem 2.2, Lemma 2.9 and section 6
arxiv created 2015/10/04 · openalex publication_date 2015/10/06 · arxiv updated 2016/05/06 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We study Sp(2n,R)-invariant functionals on the spaces of smooth vectors in Speh representations of GL(2n,R). For even n we give expressions for such invariant functionals using an explicit realization of the space of smooth vectors in the Speh representations. Furthermore, we show that the functional we construct is, up to a constant, the unique functional on the Speh representation which is invariant under the Siegel parabolic subgroup of Sp(2n,R). For odd n we show that the Speh representations do not admit an invariant functional with respect to the subgroup U(n) of Sp(2n,R) consisting of unitary matrices. Our construction, combined with the argument in [GOSS12], gives a purely local and explicit construction of Klyachko models for all unitary representations of GL(2n,R).