vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Can we measure individual black-hole spins from gravitational-wave observations?

2015/12/15 by Michael Pürrer, M. Pürrer, Mark Hannam +2
Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · #Algorithm #Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations #Astrophysics #Binary black hole #Binary number #Black hole (networking) #Computational physics #Condensed matter physics #Geophysics and Sensor Technology #Gravitational wave #LIGO #Measure (data warehouse) #Parameterized complexity #Physics #Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research #Spin (aerodynamics) #Spins #astro-ph.HE #gr-qc

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.084042

published as Phys. Rev. D 93, 084042 (2016) · 13 pages, 10 figures

arxiv created 2015/12/15 · openalex publication_date 2016/04/20 · arxiv updated 2016/04/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Measurements of black-hole spins from gravitational-wave observations of black-hole binaries with ground-based detectors are known to be hampered by partial degeneracies in the gravitational-wave phasing: between the two component spins, and between the spins and the binary's mass ratio, at least for signals that are dominated by the binary's inspiral. Through the merger and ringdown, however, a different set of degeneracies apply. This suggests the possibility that, if the inspiral, merger and ringdown are all within the sensitive frequency band of a detector, we may be able to break these degeneracies and more accurately measure both spins. In this work we investigate our ability to measure individual spins for nonprecessing binaries, for a range of configurations and signal strengths, and conclude that in general the spin of the larger black hole will be measurable (at best) with observations from Advanced LIGO and Virgo. This implies that in many applications waveform models parameterized by only one effective spin will be sufficient. Our work does not consider precessing binaries or subdominant harmonics, although we provide some arguments why we expect that these will not qualitatively change our conclusions.

Citations