2018/07/17 by Christoph Steinbrüchel, Steinbrüchel, Christoph
Arts and Humanities · Decision Sciences · #Academic Writing and Publishing #Digital Libraries (cs.DL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #scientometrics and bibliometrics research
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06442
openalex publication_date 2018/07/17 · openalex created_date 2018/08/03 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
A new citation index hPI for principal investigators (PIs) is defined in analogy to Hirsch's index h, but based on renormalized citations of a PI's papers. To this end, the authors of a paper are divided into two groups: PIs and non-PIs. A PI is defined as an assistant, associate or full professor at a university who supervises an individual research program. The citations for each paper of a certain PI are then divided by the number of PIs among the authors of that paper. Data are presented for a sample of 48 PIs who are senior faculty members of physics and physics-related engineering departments at a private research-oriented U.S. university, using the ISI Web of Science citations database. The main result is that individual rankings based on h and hPI differ substantially. Also, to a good approximation across the sample of 48 PIs, one finds that hPI = h / √() where is the average number of principal investigators on the papers of a particular PI. In addition, hPI = (1)/(2) √Ctot /, where Ctot is the total number of citations. Approaches to broadening the scope of h or hPI are discussed briefly, and a new metric for highly cited papers called hx is introduced which represents the average number of citations exceeding the minimum of h2 in the h-core.