2022/03/28 by Д. О. Гимранов, Hervé Bocherens, Nadja Kavcik-Graumann +2 · 1 citation
Environmental Science · Social Sciences · Earth and Planetary Sciences · #Wildlife Ecology and Conservation #Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology #Evolution and Paleontology Studies
paper · doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2056837
openalex publication_date 2022/03/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
In the rich vertebrate fauna of Imanay Cave the abundant material of the small-sized cave bears was originally assigned to the taxon Ursus savini. Teeth and metapodials of statistical amounts were compared with other cave bear faunas and the taxonomic position was determined through morphological and metric analyses. The size of teeth and metapodial bones is significantly smaller in Imanay Cave bears compared to the typical U. deningeri from Mosbach and Hundsheim. Although the teeth are smaller, they reached higher evolutionary level than those from Mosbach or Hundsheim.The bear remains from Imanay Cave show great similarities to the fossils from Kizel Cave in the Ural Mountains described as Ursus rossicus Borissiak, 1930 but also to the remains of small-bodied cave bears of the Alps described as Ursus deningeroides Mottl, 1964. Remarkable are the differences in size of the front dentition: the incisors from Imanay Cave are on average >10% longer and wider than the corresponding teeth from U. deningeroides but also wider than the classic U. deningeri. Preliminary carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses suggest that the small cave bears from Imanay Cave were herbivorous.