Section 235 of the Constitution: Too Soon or too Late for Cultural Self-Determination in South Africa?

2014/01/01 by Bertus De Villiers · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Business, Management and Accounting · #Legal Issues in South Africa #Taxation and Legal Issues #Comparative and International Law Studies

paper · doi:10.1080/19962126.2014.11865118

openalex publication_date 2014/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29

Abstract

Section 235 of the Constitution acknowledges the right of cultural groups to selfdetermination. Giving practical effect to s 235 is a task to be undertaken by a future Parliament. This article explores the concept of non-territorial, also called cultural autonomy, whereby culture groups can establish a legal person clothed with public law powers as an organ of government to make decisions about the protection and promotion of their culture, language and customs. Several case studies where cultural autonomy is applied are referred to and recommendations are made for future consideration in South Africa.

Cited by

• Orania [wikipedia]

Related

• Constitutional citizenship in South Africa
• Excluding Indigenous Australians from ‘The People’: A Reconsideration of Sections 25 and 127 of the Constitution
• Protection of fundamental rights of peoples belonging to disputed/occupied territories not protected by a constitution (Gilgit-Baltistan): Approaches of developing democracies (India and Pakistan) to autonomy and self-determination
• The Lesotho Constitution and Doctrine of Separation of Powers: Reflections on the Judicial Attitude
• “A World Made Safe for Diversity”