2019/07/31 by Pierre Azoulay, Christian Fons‐Rosen, Joshua Graff Zivin · 2 citations
Decision Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Biology #Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis #Economics #Environmental ethics #Field (mathematics) #Frontier #Geography #Law #Neoclassical economics #Philosophy #Physics #Political science #Positive economics #Sociology #Star (game theory) #Surge #Vitality #scientometrics and bibliometrics research
paper · doi:10.1257/aer.20161574
openalex publication_date 2019/07/31 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04
We examine how the premature death of eminent life scientists alters the vitality of their fields. While the flow of articles by collaborators into affected fields decreases after the death of a star scientist, the flow of articles by non-collaborators increases markedly. This surge in contributions from outsiders draws upon a different scientific corpus and is disproportionately likely to be highly cited. While outsiders appear reluctant to challenge leadership within a field when the star is alive, the loss of a luminary provides an opportunity for fields to evolve in new directions that advance the frontier of knowledge within them.