vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolic events in women taking progestin-only contraception: a meta-analysis

2012/08/07 by Simon Mantha, Rebecca Karp, Vidya Raghavan +3 · 2 citations
Medicine · #Reproductive Health and Contraception #Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms #Iron Metabolism and Disorders

paper · pdf · doi:10.1136/bmj.e4944

openalex publication_date 2012/08/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolic events associated with the use of progestin-only contraception and whether that risk differs with the mode of drug delivery (oral, intrauterine, or depot injection). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials and case-control, cohort, and cross sectional studies with venous thromboembolic outcome for progestin-only contraception reported relative to a non-hormone comparator group. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by two independent investigators, and consensus for inclusion was reached after assessment by additional investigators. RESULTS: Among the 2022 unique references identified by all searches, eight observational studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. A total of 147 women across all studies were diagnosed with a venous thromboembolic event while taking progestin-only contraception, and the summary measure for the adjusted relative risk of a venous thromboembolic episode for users versus non-users of a progestin-only contraceptive was, based on the random effects model, 1.03 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.39). Subgroup analysis confirmed there was no association between venous thromboembolic risk and progestin-only pills (relative risk 0.90 (0.57 to 1.45)) or a progestin intrauterine device (0.61 (0.24 to 1.53)). The relative risk of a venous thromboembolic event for users of an injectable progestin versus non-users was 2.67 (1.29 to 5.53). CONCLUSIONS: Published data assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in women prescribed progestin-only contraception are limited. In this meta-analysis of eight observational studies, the use of progestin-only contraception was not associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism compared with non-users of hormonal contraception. The potential association between injectable progestins and thrombosis requires further study.

Citations

Cited by