vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Approximations for Throughput Maximization

2020/01/27 by Dylan Hyatt-Denesik, Hyatt-Denesik, Dylan, Mirmahdi Rahgoshay +3 · 1 citation
Business, Management and Accounting · Computer Science · Engineering · #Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis #Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Interconnection Networks and Systems #Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.10037

openalex publication_date 2020/01/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

In this paper we study the classical problem of throughput maximization. In this problem we have a collection J of n jobs, each having a release time rj, deadline dj, and processing time pj. They have to be scheduled non-preemptively on m identical parallel machines. The goal is to find a schedule which maximizes the number of jobs scheduled entirely in their [rj,dj] window. This problem has been studied extensively (even for the case of m=1). Several special cases of the problem remain open. Bar-Noy et al. [STOC1999] presented an algorithm with ratio 1-1/(1+1/m)m for m machines, which approaches 1-1/e as m increases. For m=1, Chuzhoy-Ostrovsky-Rabani [FOCS2001] presented an algorithm with approximation with ratio 1-(1)/(e)-ε (for any ε>0). Recently Im-Li-Moseley [IPCO2017] presented an algorithm with ratio 1-1/e-ε0 for some absolute constant ε0>0 for any fixed m. They also presented an algorithm with ratio 1-O(√(log m/m))-ε for general m which approaches 1 as m grows. The approximability of the problem for m=O(1) remains a major open question. Even for the case of m=1 and c=O(1) distinct processing times the problem is open (Sgall [ESA2012]). In this paper we study the case of m=O(1) and show that if there are c distinct processing times, i.e. pj's come from a set of size c, then there is a (1-ε)-approximation that runs in time O(n^mc7ε-6log T), where T is the largest deadline. Therefore, for constant m and constant c this yields a PTAS. Our algorithm is based on proving structural properties for a near optimum solution that allows one to use a dynamic programming with pruning.

Cited by

Related