2017/01/01 by Laura Wangerin · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · #Archaeology #Art #Byzantine Studies and History #Computer science #Corporate governance #Field (mathematics) #German #Government (linguistics) #Historical and Archaeological Studies #Historiography #History #Management #Medieval Literature and History #Perspective (graphical) #Philosophy #Political science #Sketch #Social science #Sociology #Visual arts
paper · doi:10.1111/hic3.12367
openalex publication_date 2017/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
Abstract The historiographic tradition for the tenth‐century Saxon Ottonian dynasty has without doubt been influenced by Germany's more recent past. Events in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries shaped the worldviews of historians both within Germany and without. These events also had a direct effect on the methodologies employed by those historians in studying medieval Germany, and helped to suppress interest in the field by non‐German historians. But in the last decades of the twentieth century, there was a kind of watershed for Ottonian studies. Historians who remain influential yet today began to ask new questions and approach the field with new methodologies that took work on the Ottonians in new directions. Additionally, these new approaches have stimulated lively and often contentious debates. There is much about Ottonian government that continues to puzzle scholars. This article provides a sketch of some of the main institutions of Ottonian governance, using these as a way to introduce the reader to the historiography and historiographical debates in the field.