2012/10/29 by Michael Smith · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #European Union Policy and Governance #International Relations and Foreign Policy #International Development and Aid
paper · doi:10.1080/07036337.2012.726010
openalex publication_date 2012/10/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
This article argues that EU external relations since the Maastricht Treaty have constituted the Union as a hybrid international actor, reflecting a number of tensions built into the roots of the treaty. These tensions — reflected in the international roles and status of the EU — arise from the logics expressed in institutions and policies, and the ways in which those logics interact with each other when confronted with situations in which diplomatic, economic and security concerns are entangled. The result is that the EU has an ambiguous relationship to issues of European and world order. Since Maastricht, successive grafts in treaties and other forms have added elements to the EU’s external relations, but have not resolved the basic issues and ambiguities attending hybridity. The article explores these issues and ambiguities and relates them to four key roles claimed by the EU in the world arena: those of market actor, security actor, diplomatic actor and normative actor.