2025/11/27 by Yuanzhe Ma, Huang, Yian, Ma, Yuanzhe +2
Decision Sciences · Mathematics · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Meta-analysis and systematic reviews #Methodology (stat.ME) #Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.22003
openalex publication_date 2025/11/27 · openalex created_date 2025/12/03 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Limited overlap between treated and control groups is a key challenge in observational analysis. Standard approaches like trimming importance weights can reduce variance but introduce a fundamental bias. We propose a sensitivity framework for contextualizing findings under limited overlap, where we assess how irregular the outcome function has to be in order for the main finding to be invalidated. Our approach is based on worst-case confidence bounds on the bias introduced by standard trimming practices, under explicit assumptions necessary to extrapolate counterfactual estimates from regions of overlap to those without. Empirically, we demonstrate how our sensitivity framework protects against spurious findings by quantifying uncertainty in regions with limited overlap.