2019/09/07 by Isabelle Augenstein, Augenstein, Isabelle, Christina Lioma +11 · 11 citations
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #Expert finding and Q&A systems #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Information Retrieval (cs.IR) #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Misinformation and Its Impacts #Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining #Topic Modeling
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.03242
openalex publication_date 2019/09/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We contribute the largest publicly available dataset of naturally occurring\nfactual claims for the purpose of automatic claim verification. It is collected\nfrom 26 fact checking websites in English, paired with textual sources and rich\nmetadata, and labelled for veracity by human expert journalists. We present an\nin-depth analysis of the dataset, highlighting characteristics and challenges.\nFurther, we present results for automatic veracity prediction, both with\nestablished baselines and with a novel method for joint ranking of evidence\npages and predicting veracity that outperforms all baselines. Significant\nperformance increases are achieved by encoding evidence, and by modelling\nmetadata. Our best-performing model achieves a Macro F1 of 49.2%, showing that\nthis is a challenging testbed for claim veracity prediction.\n