2019/10/29 by David Alvarez-Melis, Hal Daumé, Alvarez-Melis, David +6 · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Computer Science · Decision Sciences · Mathematics · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Meta-analysis and systematic reviews #Philosophy and History of Science #cs.AI #cs.LG #stat.ML
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.13503
Human-Centric Machine Learning (HCML) Workshop @ NeurIPS 2019
arxiv created 2019/10/29 · openalex publication_date 2019/10/29 · arxiv updated 2019/10/31 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Interpretability is an elusive but highly sought-after characteristic of modern machine learning methods. Recent work has focused on interpretability via explanations, which justify individual model predictions. In this work, we take a step towards reconciling machine explanations with those that humans produce and prefer by taking inspiration from the study of explanation in philosophy, cognitive science, and the social sciences. We identify key aspects in which these human explanations differ from current machine explanations, distill them into a list of desiderata, and formalize them into a framework via the notion of weight of evidence from information theory. Finally, we instantiate this framework in two simple applications and show it produces intuitive and comprehensible explanations.